What’s New.
What shipped, when, and what it proved. Most recent first.
ChipCraftVS Is Now on the Visual Studio Marketplace
ChipCraftVS brings the ChipCraftX agents into Visual Studio Code. Generate Verilog and SystemVerilog, review inline edits, and inspect simulation waveforms alongside your RTL. The extension is now available to install from the Visual Studio Marketplace.
- ›AI-assisted RTL generation and inline edits with a reviewable diff
- ›Synthesis-aware diagnostics in the editor
- ›Integrated waveform viewing for simulation results
- ›Switchable agent personas for different stages of the design workflow
- ›Preview release v0.1.1
- ›Requires Visual Studio Code 1.85.0 or later
ChipCraftModel-1: Our Own Model, at a Twentieth of the Price of Sonnet 5
ChipCraftModel-1 (CCM-1) is the first model in the ChipCraftModel family: a custom model trained on the ChipCraftX dataset and deployed on ChipCraftX infrastructure. It is not a general assistant that happens to know some Verilog. It is built for the whole RTL job - drafting a block to the interface it has to hit, refining it in steps, repairing what simulation rejects, and wiring the pieces into a system that boots. Because we train it and we host it, two things follow that a general-purpose API cannot offer: your unreleased design never reaches a third-party model provider, and the price is a fraction of frontier. CCM-1 runs at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output - a twentieth of Claude Sonnet 5, and a hundredth of a frontier model on blended cost. Early Access is open to design teams now.
- ›Trained on the ChipCraftX dataset - RTL nobody else has, EDA-verified before it ever became training data
- ›Deployed on ChipCraftX infrastructure - no third-party model provider anywhere in the request path
- ›A twentieth of the price of Claude Sonnet 5, and a hundredth of a frontier model on blended cost
- ›Built for the whole RTL job, not just the first draft: draft, refine, repair, and wire a system together
- ›Your specs and generated RTL are never used to train our models, and are purged after a short debug window
- ›Early Access now open to design teams
- ›$0.10 per 1M input tokens - 5% of Claude Sonnet 5
- ›$0.50 per 1M output tokens - 5% of Claude Sonnet 5
- ›1% of Claude Fable 5 on blended input-plus-output cost
- ›Zero third-party egress - generation stays on ChipCraftX infrastructure
“An unreleased architecture is the most sensitive thing a hardware team owns. CCM-1 exists so it never has to leave our infrastructure to get written, and so it costs a fraction of sending it somewhere else.”
ChipCraftBrain Paper Published on arXiv
Our research paper, ChipCraftBrain: Validation-First RTL Generation via Multi-Agent Orchestration, is now published on arXiv. It formalizes the architecture behind our benchmark results: a hybrid symbolic-neural system that orchestrates six specialized agents over a 168-dimensional state space, combining pattern retrieval, hierarchical decomposition, and adaptive reinforcement learning to solve RTL generation at production accuracy.
- ›Adaptive multi-agent orchestration over a 168-dimensional state space
- ›Hybrid architecture: algorithmic solvers for logic, neural for timing and RTL
- ›321 pattern templates + 971 open-source implementations for targeted retrieval
- ›Hierarchical decomposition with synchronized module interfaces
- ›RISC-V case study: full validated hardware generation end-to-end
- ›Zero fine-tuning: pure architectural advantage over trained competitors
- ›98.72% on VerilogEval-Human (154/156 problems)
- ›94.7% on NVIDIA CVDP (286/302 problems)
Local Testbench Model: 100% semantic accuracy, zero API cost
We trained a dedicated testbench LLM that replaces all cloud API calls for testbench generation. When it produces a testbench that compiles, it passes simulation 100% of the time: zero semantic failures. Compilation-only failures account for the remaining 7.3% and are recoverable through iteration. This drops per-run testbench cost to zero and unblocks unlimited-budget preference training for the RTL model. The model was fine-tuned on a curated dataset of ~150K verified entries. Verify-before-train discipline is why the model achieves zero semantic failures on compiled outputs: it learned from exclusively correct signal and can expand to novel specs.
- ›100% simulation pass on compiled outputs
- ›92.7% generalization power
- ›Replaces all cloud API calls for testbench generation: cost per run for testbenches drop to $0
- ›Runs entirely on local GPU infrastructure
- ›Enables unlimited-cost preference training for RTL model improvement
- ›100% simulation pass on compiled outputs - zero semantic failures
- ›92.7% generalization power
- ›7.3% compilation-only failures - recoverable through iteration
- ›~150K verified entries in the curated training set
- ›$0 per-run testbench cost - runs on local GPU infrastructure
“Verification is the moat. Every piece we bring in-house makes the loop tighter.”
CVDP: 54.24% pass rate improvement over SOTA baseline while requiring only 1.28 iterations on average
The previous SOTA relied on fine-tuned models, massive compute budgets, and hundreds of retries. ChipCraftBrain solves the same problems in 1.28 iterations on average, lifting the pass rate by 54.24 percentage points through a fundamentally different approach.
- ›94.7% on NVIDIA CVDP (302 problems), the hardest public RTL benchmark
- ›Wins 3/4 shared categories vs ACE-RTL: Code Completion +12.75pp, Modification +5.49pp, Spec-to-RTL tied
- ›5 iterations vs 150 attempts: 30× more efficient
- ›GPT-5 peaked at 60%. Their fine-tuned generator: 67%. ChipCraftBrain: 94.7%.
- ›94.7% overall: #1 published result on CVDP
- ›96.4% Code Modification, 96.2% Spec-to-RTL, 93.6% Code Completion
- ›97.5% RTL Optimization, a category ACE-RTL didn't even attempt
- ›Zero fine-tuning, zero custom training data: pure architectural advantage
“We invite all other competitors to publish their scores on CVDP and similar benchmarks for fair evaluation of the systems.”
VerilogEval 98.7%, #1 on the Benchmark
ChipCraftBrain achieves 98.72% pass rate on the full 156-problem VerilogEval functional benchmark, surpassing every published and commercial system, including MAGE (95.9%), ChipAgents (97.4%, closed-source), VFlow (83.6%), and CodeV (59.2%).
- ›154 of 156 problems passed via real testbench simulation
- ›Beats MAGE (95.9%), the best published academic result
- ›Beats ChipAgents (97.4%), the only commercial competitor, with unpublished methodology
- ›Average 1.14 iterations per problem, near first-try accuracy
- ›Full benchmark completed in 35.5 minutes
- ›98.72% pass rate on VerilogEval (156 problems)
- ›1.14 average iterations to solution
- ›154/156 simulation pass rate (98.72%)
- ›2.72 percentage points above ChipAgents (97.4%)
- ›2.82 percentage points above MAGE (95.9%)